Search Deeblog
This list does not yet contain any items.
Navigate through Deeblog
Login
Tuesday
Jan132009

The Valley of Fear

Once upon a time, a young, impecunious Scottish physician had a brilliant idea for making a bundle of money, and, more importantly, for squeezing some pulp out of his burgeoning creative juices.  He would concoct a story that would combine the latest elements of forensic science with the camaraderie of old knighting tales, and throw in some historical relevance for good measure.  After a sufficient amount of superficial research, he had come up with the names of his protagonists, a suitable method for introducing them (one would narrate the tale, the other would star in it), and a topical setting that evoked a wide array of interest and emotion.  The year is the palindromic 1881, and another physician of likely Scottish provenance has returned  from an Afghan war to the tranquility of London.  Needing a room, as bachelors those days were expected not to be able to do anything for themselves,  he learns of a man also looking for lodgings whose "studies are very desultory and eccentric" and who "has amassed a lot of out-of-the-way knowledge which would astonish his professors."  Our physician, a humble soul by the name of Watson, is rather impressed by this man with "a passion for definite and exact knowledge," precisely the type of desires that should plague a man of medicine, but which, in the case of Watson, most properly do not.  How odd that the trained scientist is then the Romantic, and that his thin, ferocious, animated and highly mood-driven partner with the soul and wit of a poet is the man of unadulterated rationality; stranger still that this thinker would have an encyclopaedic command of all the crime committed in London in the last two decades.  This "walking calendar of crime" is, of course, Sherlock Holmes, and his first novel and appearance, A Study in Scarlet, is mimicked in structure by this unusual narrative, his last novel.

Unlike other tales which commence with a brief example of Holmes's deductive genius, Holmes and Watson are hardly at home or at peace for much time before Holmes receives a mysterious coded message from a man with the erudite pseudonym of Porlock.  Never identified or actually present in physical form in the novel, Porlock is one of the oddities in the Holmesian universe, an underling of the satanic Professor Moriarty who dares disobey his patron.  Money may be behind his betrayal, although Holmes unusually discusses the salary ("more than the Prime Minister gets") of Moriarty's prime henchman and Holmes's antagonist in this story; more likely is the reason Holmes surmises almost immediately: "because he feared that I would make some inquiry after him in that case, and bring trouble on him."  The case in question is deciphered with the help of Whitaker's Almanac:

There is danger/ may come very soon/ one Douglas rich/ country now at Birlstone/ confidence is pressing.

It is then far from shocking when, shortly thereafter, a Scotland Yard inspector by the name of MacDonald visits the duo to inform them that "Mr. Douglas of Birlstone Manor House was horribly murdered last night."  John Douglas to be exact, a Sussex resident of a large moated house equaled in size only by his wealth and boyish vigor.  He was "somewhat offhand in his manners," suggesting that "he had seen life in social strata on some far lower horizon," freely mingled with people of all classes including the nearby villagers whose businesses he patronized again and again, and "had spent a part of his life in America."  He was married to "a beautiful woman, tall, dark and slender, some twenty years younger than" her fiftyish husband, and very often visited in his residence by a dangerous-looking man called Cecil Barker.  But the most interesting thing about the late John Douglas was his tenacity:

The good impression which had been produced by his generosity and by his democratic manners was increased by a reputation gained for utter indifference to danger.  Though a wretched rider, he turned out at every meet, and took the most amazing falls in his determination to hold his own with the best.  When the vicarage caught fire he distinguished himself also by the fearlessness with which he reentered the building to save property, after the local fire brigade had given it up as impossible.  Thus it came about that John Douglas of the Manor House had within five years won himself quite a reputation in Birlstone.  

It is said that in premeditated crimes the character of the victim will reveal the culprit.  Determine what kind of man John Douglas was and you will soon have the reason for which he was killed; the gruesome method of execution – a sawed-off shotgun literally blowing his head to pieces and the perpetrator bounding out a tower window into the moat – will greatly distract the modern mind from this more essential matter.  And so, Holmes proceeds with great alacrity through the palette of possible solutions before arriving at one of the best thought-out plots and most satisfying explanations that Doyle would ever devise.

Yet the novella is hardly perfect.  As it were, it suffers from the same shortcoming that diminishes both A Study in Scarlet and The Sign of Four: a rambling, wholly unwarranted back story. Whether readers truly care about the origin of a crime may be less pertinent than Conan Doyle's limitations as a novelist.  In any case, a quick flip through the book's second half will demonstrate how one writer possessed by a spirit of genius and originality – a font of sustained brilliance rarely matched in English literature – can produce dull prose that reads like a cross between a macabre fable and something from this legendary German author of westerns.  For those readers who have not tried non-Holmes tales by Conan Doyle, there is happy news: his best work always featured Holmes and always featured Watson.  So when critics chide Conan Doyle's forays into the fantastic, the Arthurian, and the spiritual, we would do well to recall his description of MacDonald: mediocrity knows nothing higher than itself, but talent instantly recognizes genius.  And, occasionally, genius doesn't quite realize what it has accomplished.

Thursday
Jan082009

Recortes de prensa (part 2)

The conclusion to a story ("Press clippings") by this Argentine, perhaps inspired by the deeds of the last man to be executed in FranceYou can read the original in this collection.

The sculptor returned the clipping to me; we didn't say much because we were practically keeling over with sleep.  I felt that he was happy that I had accepted to work with him on his book and only then did I realize that up until the end he had doubted my reputation of being very busy, perhaps of being selfish, of being, in any case, a writer deeply involved in her own matters.  I asked him whether there was a taxi stand nearby and walked out onto a deserted, cold and, for my tastes, far too narrow street in Paris.  A gust of wind obliged me to turn up my coat collar and I heard my steps stomping dryly in the silence, marking a rhythm in which fatigue and obsession inserted time and time again a melody, or a line from a poem, the only thing I was offered to see were her hands severed from her body and placed in a jar that bore the number 24, the only thing I was offered to see were her hands severed from her body.  I reacted brusquely, repelling the oncoming wave that came back again and again, forcing myself to breathe deeply, to think about the work of the following day.  I never knew why I had crossed over to the other sidewalk; there was no need for it since the street disembogued into the square at La Chapelle, where perhaps I would find a taxi.  It made no difference to me whether I walked on one pavement or the other, but I crossed because I no longer had the strength to ask myself why I was crossing.

The girl was sitting on a step in a doorway almost lost among the other doorways of the tall and narrow houses which could hardly be differentiated from one another on this particularly dark block.  What a girl could be doing at this hour of the night and in such loneliness on the edge of a step did not surprise me as much as her posture, a whitish stain with her legs open and hands covering her face, something that could have just as easily been a dog or a crate of trash abandoned at the entrance to a building.  I looked around vaguely: a truck was moving away with its stupid yellow lights; on the opposing sidewalk, a man was walking hunched over, his head deep in his raised collar and his hands in his pockets.  I stopped and looked around again: the girl had thin braids, a white skirt, and a pink knit sweater on.  And when her hands parted I saw her eyes and her cheeks and not even the partial darkness could erase her tears, their sheen dripping down towards her mouth.

"What's wrong?  What are you doing out here?"

I heard her breathe in sharply, swallowing her tears and snot, a hiccup or a pout; I saw her full, chubby face reach towards me, her tiny red nose, the curve of a trembling mouth.  I repeated my questions, saying God knows what as I bent down until I felt her very close.

"My mom," said the girl panting in-between her words.  "My dad’s doing things to my mom."

Perhaps she was about to say more but her arms relaxed and I felt her cling to me, crying desperately on my neck; she smelled dirty, like wet underwear.  I wanted to take her in my arms as I got up, but she moved away, looking in the darkness of the corridor.  Her finger was pointing out something to me; she began to walk and I followed her, barely making out a stone arch and, behind that, the darkness, the beginning of a garden.  She walked out silently into the open air, which surrounded not a garden but an orchard with low fences which gave sown fields boundaries.  There was enough light to see the rachitic mastic trees, the reeds which supported climbing plants, rags like scarecrows.  Towards the center a pavilion was divided in patches with sheets of zinc and cans, a small window from which a green light emanated.  There were no lights on in the windows of the buildings which encircled the orchard, and the black walls rose five floors high until they flowed into a low and cloudy sky.

The girl had walked in small, measured steps directly between the two stonemasons who guarded the gate to the pavilion.  She hardly turned around to make sure that I was following her and entered the building.  I know that I should have held up here, turned around, told myself that this girl had had a bad dream and returned to bed.  All the reasons of rational thinking at this very moment showed me the absurdity and perhaps even the risk of entering someone else’s house at this hour of the night; maybe I was still telling myself that when I passed through the half-open door and saw the girl waiting for me in a vague hallway full of tools and assorted junk.  A ray of light slipped out from under the last door at the back, and the girl motioned to me with her hand and, almost running, stepped across the rest of the hallway.  Then she began opening the door imperceptibly.  Close to her, getting the full yellow rays of the crevice which was expanding little by little, I smelled something burnt, heard something like a drowned scream again and again, stopping then repeating.  My hand gave the door a push and I entered the infected apartment with broken stools and a table full of glasses and bottles of beer and wine, and a mat stacked with old newspapers; past all this was a bed and on it a body tied up and gagged with a wet towel, her hands and feet bound in iron bars.

Sitting on a bench with his back to me, the girl's dad was doing things to her mom.  He was taking his time, slowly lifting his cigarette to his mouth, letting the smoke out little by little through his nose as he placed the lit stub of the cigarette on the mother's breast.  Through the towel wrapped around her mouth and face apart from the eyes, the mother's suffocated screams went on and on.  Before I had time to understand, to accept being part of this, the father found time to withdraw the cigarette from his mouth and then bring it back again; he found time to revive the ember and savor its excellent French tobacco; he found time to let me see the burned body, burned from the stomach to the neck, the red and bluish stains that went from the thighs and the vagina to her breasts where now he was lifting her arm with studied delicateness to find a spot on her skin without scars.  The screams and shaking of her body in the bed which creaked in spasms were mixed with things and acts which I did not choose and will never be able to explain to myself.  Between me and the man with his back to me came a decrepit stool; I saw it rise in the air and fall on its side on the dad's head; his body and the stool rolled on the ground in almost the same second.  I had to step back so as not to fall down myself, and the movement of raising the stool and discharging its weight had absorbed all of my strength, my strength which abandoned me at that very instant, which left me alone like a tottering old doll.  I know that I went to look for help and didn't find it; that I looked vaguely behind me and saw the door locked; the girl was no longer there and the man on the floor was a confused blot, a wrinkled heap of rags.  What came afterwards I could have seen in a film or read in a book: I was there without being there, but I was there with such agility and assiduity that, in a short while, if this were happening in time, I came to find a knife on the table, cut the ropes that bound the woman, rip the towel from her face and see her straighten herself out in silence, now perfectly in silence as if it were necessary and almost unavoidable, and watch the body on the floor which was starting to contract unconsciously, although that was not going to be for long, watch her go towards the body without a word, seize it by the arms while I took its legs and with doubled momentum, we tied it to the bed, we bound it with the same ropes hurriedly reconfigured and retied, we tied it up and muzzled it in the same silence in which an ultrasonic sound seemed to be vibrating and trembling. 

What happens next I don't know.  I still see the naked woman, her hands pulling off pieces of clothes, unbuttoning a pair of pants, and lowering them until they had reached the feet, I see her eyes in my eyes, one pair of eyes doubled and four hands pulling off and tearing off and taking off a cardigan, a shirt, a slip.  And now that I have to remember it and write it down, my woeful condition and rough memory bring me another matter, unspeakably vivid but unseen, a passage in a story by Jack London in which a trapper from the north struggles for a clean death while, at his side, a bloodstained matter keeps him conscious, his adventure buddy howls and convulses torturously for the women of the tribe who are to make him live out a horrific prolongation of life between spasms and screams, killing him without killing him, exquisitely refined in every new variant never described here, as we are never described and doing what we were supposed to do, what we had to do.  It was useless to ask myself now why I was involved in all this, what right did I have, and what was my part in what happened before my very eyes, what they no doubt saw, what they no doubt remember, just like London's imagination must have seen and remembered what his hand was not capable of writing.  I only know that the girl was not with us once I entered the room, and that now her mom was doing things to her dad, but who knows whether it was only her mom or perhaps indeed once again the howls of the night wind, fragments of images returning from a newspaper clipping, hands severed from her body and placed in a jar that bore the number 24, through unofficial sources we learned that he died suddenly at the beginning of the torture, the towel in the mouth, the lit cigarettes, and Victoria, two years and six months old, and Hugo Roberto, one year and six months old, abandoned at the door to the building.  How is one to know how long it lasted, how is one, including me, to understand, even me, although I think of myself as one of the good guys; how is one, including me, to accept, even me, because I am on the other side of the severed hands and mass graves, on the other side of girls tortured and shot that Christmas night; the rest is having your back to it, crossing the orchard beating me against the fence and gashing open my knee, going out onto a cold and deserted street and arriving at La Chapelle and almost immediately finding a taxi that brought me glass after glass of vodka and sleep from which I only awoke at midday, lying across my bed and dressed from head to foot, with my knee bloodied and that occasionally providential headache which pure vodka can give you when it goes straight from the bottleneck into your throat.

I worked the whole afternoon; it seemed inevitable and amazing that I was capable of concentrating to such an extent.  At nightfall I phoned the sculptor, who seemed surprised at my early reappearance.  I told him what had happened to me, and he respected me enough to let me spit it all out to him at one go, even though at times I heard him cough or try to start a question.  

"So that you see," I told him, "you see it didn't take me that much time to deliver what I promised you."

"I don't get it," said the sculptor. "If you mean the text on ..."

"Yes, that's what I mean.  What I just read to you is the text.  I'll send it to you once I've cleaned it up a bit; I don't want to have it here anymore."

Two or three days later, after a tempest of pills, drinks and thirty-threes anything that could provide a barrier I went out onto the street to buy some groceries; the fridge was empty and Mimosa was meowing at the foot of my bed.  In my mailbox was a letter with the stout handwriting of the sculptor on the envelope.  Inside I found a sheet of paper and a newspaper clipping; I began reading as I walked towards the market and only later realized that I had ripped the envelope when I opened it and lost a part of the clipping.  The sculptor thanked me for the text to his album unusual but, it seemed, very much in my style, outside of all the usual customs in artistic photo albums although he didn't care much about it just like I hadn't cared.  There was a postscript: "In you we lost a great dramatic actress, although luckily an excellent writer was saved.  The other evening I thought for a moment that you were telling me something that had actually occurred, after which I just happened to read France-Soir, from which I can tell you I found the source of your notable personal experience.  Surely a writer might argue that if his inspiration comes from reality, even from police reports and news, what he might be able to do with it has the potential of another dimension and gives it a different value.  In any case, dear Noemí, we are too good friends for it to have been necessary to condition me in advance to your text and deploy your talents on the phone.  But let's leave it at that; you already know how much I appreciate your cooperation and I am very happy about ..."

I looked at the clipping and saw that I had ripped it inadvertently, the envelope and the piece stuck within it had been tossed somewhere.  The article was worthy of France-Soir and its style: atrocious drama in a suburb of Marseilles; macabre discovery of a sadistic crime; former plumber bound and gagged in a rickety bed; a body, etc.; neighbors furtively on the up-and-up regarding repeated scenes of violence; a small girl missing for days; neighbors suspecting negligence and abandonment; police looking for his mistress; the horrible spectacle which was offered to the and here was where the clipping ended.  At the end of it all, having wet the tongue of the envelope too much, the sculptor had done what Jack London and my memory had done; but the photo of the pavilion was complete and it was the pavilion in the orchard, the fences and the sheets of zinc, the high walls encircling everything with their blind eyes, neighbors furtively aware, neighbors suspecting abandonment, all of this was beating my face into the fragments of the story.

I took a taxi and got off at the rue de Riquet, knowing that this was idiocy and doing it because this was how stupid things were done.  In broad daylight this had nothing to do with my memory and, still, I walked looking at every house and crossed over to the other pavement as I remembered having done, and I didn't recognize a single doorway from that night.  The light fell over everything like some infinite mask, doorways but not like the doorway, no access to an interior orchard simply because this orchard was in the suburbs of Marseilles.  But the girl was indeed there, sitting on the step in an entrance playing with some kind of rag doll.  When I spoke to her, she hustled off running up to the first door, a concierge coming out before I could call her.  She wanted to know whether I was a social worker; surely I had come for the girl I had found lost in the street; that same morning a few people had been by to identify her and a social worker was coming to look for her.  Although I already knew what it was, I asked for her last name before leaving.  Then I betook myself to a café and on the back of the sculptor's letter wrote the conclusion to the text, then went to slip it under his door.  Just so he would know how it ended, that the text to accompany his sculptures was complete.         

Wednesday
Jan072009

Recortes de prensa (part 1)

The first half of a story ("Press clippings") by this Argentine, perhaps inspired by the deeds of the last man to be executed in France.  You can read the original in this collection.

Although I don't need to say so, the first clipping is real and the second imaginary.

It seems relevant to mention that the sculptor lives on Rue de Riquet, although in Paris you can't be too choosy when you're an Argentine sculptor, two very difficult ways of making a life for yourself in this city.  As it were, we haven't gotten to know each other all that well in those fragments of time approaching twenty years.  When he called me to talk about a book of reproductions of his most recent work and asked me to write an accompanying text, I told him what was always appropriate in such cases: that either he should show me his sculptures and then we'd see about that or, rather, we'd see about that later on.

That night I went to his apartment where we began with coffee and friendly jabs, both of us feeling what one cannot help feeling when one person shows another his work.  Then came that almost always fearful moment in which the bonfires of the home would be lit; otherwise one would have to acknowledge, covering it up with words, that the firewood, emitting more smoke than heat, was still wet.  Earlier on the phone, he had talked about his works, a series of small sculptures whose common theme was violence at all political and geographical parts which man could reach as wolf to man.  We knew something about all this, two more Argentines rising on a wave of memories, the daily accumulation of horror from cables, letters and sudden silence.  While we were talking, he went to clear off a table; then he sat me down in a convenient armchair and began bringing out his sculptures.  They were all placed under flattering light, obviously planned out beforehand, and I was allowed to examine them slowly, in time turning them and examining them from all sides.  Now we hardly exchanged a word; it was the sculptures who were speaking, and their speech continued to be ours, one after the other until we had a good dozen or so.  They were small and filiform, loamy and plastered, born from wires or bottles patiently wrapped by fingers and palette knifes and growing, from empty cans and objects which only the sculptor's confidence allowed me to recognize, into bodies and heads, arms and hands.  It was late at night; from the streets we could hear the faint noise of heavy trucks and ambulance sirens.

What I particularly liked about the sculptor's work was that there was no system.  Nothing was too explicit; each piece contained something enigmatic, making it often necessary to keep gazing at each object, gazing and gazing as the minutes slipped by, in order to understand the manner in which violence was expressed.  At the same time the sculptures seemed both ingenious and subtle.  In any case, there was no alarmism or sentimental extortion.  Even torture, the ultimate form of violence carried out in the horror of immobility and isolation, was not evident in the dubious minutia of so many posters, texts and films now returning to my equally dubious memory, equally too quick to retain certain images and reduce them to who knows what kind of obscure complacency. 

I thought that if I were to write the text the sculptor had asked me to write, If I write what you're asking me to write, I said to him, it will be a text like these pieces; I would never allow myself that ease of expression so filthily abundant in this type of work.

"That's your business, Noemí," he said to me.  "I know it's not easy.  Our memories are so awash in blood  that sometimes one feels guilty of putting up limits, of handling them so that they don't flood over us."

"You're preaching to the choir.  Look at this clipping: I know the woman whose name is signed at the bottom, and I found out some things from reports of friends.  Three years passed as if it were last night, just like it could happen at the same moment in Buenos Aires or Montevideo.  Just before leaving to come over to your place, I opened the letter of a friend and found the clipping.  Pour me another cup of coffee while I read this to you; in reality, I don't need to read it after what you've shown me here today.  But who knows, I think I'd feel better if you read it as well."

What he read was this:

I, the undersigned, Laura Beatriz Bonaparte Bruschtein, residing at Atoyac, number 26, district 10, Colonia Cuauhtémoc, Mexico 5, Mexico City, would like to share the following testimony with the general public:

1. Aída Leonora Bruschtein Bonaparte, born May 21, 1951 in Buenos Aires, Argentina, a literacy tutor by profession.

Fact: At ten o'clock in the morning on December 24, 1975, Aída Leonora Bruschtein Bonaparte was kidnapped by members of the Argentine National Army (Batallion 601) at her workplace, in Villa Miseria Monte Chingolo, near the Federal Capital.

On the day previous, this site had witnessed a battle which had resulted in more than a hundred casualties, including civilians.  After being kidnapped, my daughter was taken to the military garrison of Battalion 601.

There she was brutally tortured, just like all the other women.  Those who survived were shot that Christmas night.  Among them was my daughter. 

The burial of those killed in battle and the kidnapped citizens, as in the case of my daughter, was delayed by about five days.  All the bodies, including hers, were carried by bulldozers from the battalion to the commissary of Lanús, from there to the cemetery of Avellaneda, where they were buried in a common grave.

I kept looking at the last sculpture left atop the table which prevented me from watching the sculptor as he read in silence.  Only now did I hear the tick-tock of the clock hands coming from the hall; it was the only thing audible at this moment; outside, the streets were becoming more and more deserted; this light sound came to me like a metronome of the night, an attempt to keep alive the time contained within that needle by which we were both being measured.  Time that had reached a room in Paris and a miserable neighborhood in Buenos Aires, that abolished calendars and left us face-to-face with this, confronted with what we could only call this, with all of our qualifications used up, the tired and filthy gestures of horror.  

"Those who survived were shot that Christmas night," the sculptor read aloud.  "Perhaps they also gave them bread and cider.  Remember that in Auschwitz children were given candy before being forced into the gas chambers."

He must have picked up on something in my expression, because he made a gesture of apology, lowered his eyes and looked for another cigarette.

Officially, I learned of the murder of my daughter on January 8, 1976, in the eighth court of the city of La Plata.  I was later referred to the commissary of Lanús where, after three hours of interrogation, I was told where the grave was located.  The only thing I was offered to see of my daughter were her hands severed from her body and placed in a jar that bore the number 24.  What remained of her body could not be handed over because it was a military secret.  The following day I went to the cemetery in Avellaneda looking for tombstone 28.  The commissary had informed me that there I would find, "what remained of her, because what we were given could not be properly termed bodies."  The grave was an area of earth recently displaced, five meters square, more or less at the back of the cemetery.  I know its location.  It was awful to realize how more than a hundred people were murdered and buried, among them my daughter.

2. In light of this dreadful situation and the indescribable cruelty of January 1976, I, residing at Lavalle street 730, fifth floor, new district, in the Federal Capital, charge the Argentine Army with murder.  I am pursuing my case in the same La Plata tribunal, in the eighth civil court.  

"You see, all of this does us no good," said the sculptor, barring the air with an outstretched arm.  "No good at all, Noemí.  I spend months putting together all this shit, you write books, this woman denounces atrocities, we go to conventions and round table discussions to protest, and we almost come to believe that things are changing.  And then it takes two minutes to read the truth yet again, so that ..."

"Shush, I'm also thinking about a few things right now," I said with the fervor of someone who had to say exactly that.  "If one just accepted these things, it would be the equivalent of sending them a telegram of support.  Moreover, you know full well that tomorrow you're going to get up and spend time assembling another sculpture.  And you'll also know that Ill be in front of my typewriter and you'll think that we're many although we're actually few, and that the disparity in forces is not and never will be a reason to keep quiet.  End of sermon.  Did you finish reading?  Well then, I have to go."

He gestured negatively, pointing to the coffee pot.

Consequent to this legal recourse, the following facts occurred:

3.  In March 1976, Adrián Saidón, a twenty-four-year-old Argentine, employee, and my daughter's fiancé, was murdered in the streets of the city of Buenos Aires by the police, who notified his father.

His body was not handed over to his father, Dr. Abraham Saidón, because it was a military secret.

4.  Santiago Bruschtein, an Argentine, born December 25, 1918, father of my murdered daughter previously mentioned in this document, a biochemical doctor by profession in the laboratories of the city of Morón.

Fact: On June 11, 1976, at twelve noon, a group of military officers dressed in mufti arrived at his apartment on Lavalle street, fifth floor, apartment nine.  My husband, attended by a nurse, was in his bed in an almost terminal state owing to a heart attack he had incurred, and with a prognosis of three months to live.  The soldiers asked him about me and our children, and added: How dare a son-of-a-bitch Jew charge the Argentine Army with murder.  Then they forced him to get up and, beating him, forced him into a car without letting him take his medication with him. 

Eyewitnesses have confirmed that for detainment purposes, the Army and the police employ about twenty cars.  We never heard from him again.  Through unofficial sources we learned that he died suddenly at the beginning of the torture.

"And I'm here, thousands of miles away, discussing with my editor what type of paper should be used for the pictures of the sculptures, the format and the cover."

"Bah, sweetheart, these days I've been writing a story talking about nothing less than the psy-cho-lo-gi-cal problems of a girl going through puberty.  Don't start torturing yourself; I think we have enough of the real thing."

"I know, Noemí, I know, dammit.  But it's always the same, we always have to recognize that all this happened in another space and time.  We were never there nor will we ever be there, perhaps ..."

(I recalled something I had read as a girl, perhaps by Augustin Thierry, a story in which someone, God knows what he was called now, had been trying to convert Clovis and his nation to Christianity.  When he was describing to Clovis the flagellation and crucifixion of Jesus, the king leapt out of his throne brandishing his spear and shouting: "Ah!  If only I had been there with my Franks!" – the marvel of impossible desire, the same impotent mania of the sculptor lost in his reading.)

5.  Patricia Villa, Argentine, born in Buenos Aires in 1952, journalist working for the agency Inter Press Service and the sister of my daughter-in-law.

Fact: She, like her fiancé Eduardo Suárez, a journalist as well, was arrested in September 1976.  They were transported as prisoners to the general coordination office of the Federal Police of Buenos Aires.  A week after her daughter's abduction, her mother, who had taken the pertinent legal actions, was informed that they had regrettably made a mistake.  Their bodies have not been returned to their families. 

6. Irene Mónica Bruschtein Bonaparte de Ginzberg, twenty-two years of age, a visual artist  by profession, married to Mario Ginzberg, master builder, twenty-four years old.

Fact: On the day of March 11, 1977, at six in the morning, forces comprising members of the Army and police force arrived at their apartment.  They abducted the parents and left their two children, Victoria, two years and six months old, and Hugo Roberto, one year and six months old, abandoning them at the door of the building.  We immediately took recourse to habeas corpus, I in the consulate in Mexico and Mario's father, my in-law, in the Federal Capital.

I have pleaded for my daughter Irene and for Mario, denouncing this horrific sequence of events to the United Nations, the OAS, Amnesty International, the European Parliament, the Red Cross, etc.

Nevertheless, I still have yet to receive any information on their place of incarceration.  I maintain the firm hope that they are still alive.

As a mother prevented from returning to Argentina owing to the persecution of my family as I have described, and by virtue of the fact that my legal recourses have been annulled, I call upon those institutions and persons who are engaged in defending human rights, so that the process may be initiated for the return of my daughter Irene and her husband Mario and so that their life and freedom may be safeguarded.  Signed, Laura Beatriz Bonaparte Bruschtein (From El País, October 1978, reprinted in "Denuncia," December 1978).

Monday
Jan052009

Fallen

Readers of these pages are well aware of my unabashed endorsement of freewill; without it, we are simply links on a trillion-year chain gang.  To those modern minds who cannot imagine anything past their backyard but worship distant stars more intimately than they love their fellow man, it seems inconceivable that there could exist a force that knows everything, discerns the result of every interaction from among the myriad possibilities, and yet allows us to make our own decisions.  It is inconceivable because these minds continue to believe the human race has full control of its destiny.  Yet a trillion years later, as we have evolved into sentient beings with the capacity for albeit very limited space travel, what do we know of our universe?  What mysteries have been well and truly disposed of?  What is the fate of man upon biological death?  The breakthroughs of the last one hundred fifty years, beginning with this book, have surely enlightened us as to many quirks of mammalian and other species' development – yet they only show us a potential connection, not an alpha or omega.  No more decisive is this hayrick of information than a slender eighth chapter of a book of thirty or forty chapters with no explanation of scene, character, motive or perspective.  We are frozen looking at our past and convincing ourselves that our future is as clear and unadulterated as the preserved remains of former kings – lizard or mummy – when in fact we only make this connection because this is how we think.  Proving that we were once amoebae seems perfectly logical given our microscopic humility in our mother's womb; looking upon every animal and seeing our own gestures, moods and processes makes sense because that is precisely how we project our desires onto each another; and dismissing the notion that something which did not think like we think could have possibly willed an order upon us is quite an insufferable premise for that supremely arrogant creation, modern man.  Which brings us to the underlying concept behind this fine film.

We begin with a man (Denzel Washington) almost on all fours lurching in pain through a remote wooded area.  As he scrounges and gasps for air, a voiceover explains that this "was the time I nearly died," and since Washington has one of the most recognizable voices in cinema, there is nothing out of place with such an introduction.  We move on to a more typical opening shot for a police-based drama, that of an execution.  The person on death row is the notorious serial killer Edgar Reese (Elias Koteas), and the gentleman who was strolling not so leisurely through the forest turns out to be a police officer by the name of John Hobbes.  Hobbes and Reese have had a long cat-and-mouse history that needs no detailing; suffice it to say that through Reese's spree of terror, Hobbes was the innocent do-gooder whom Reese would hang up on at all hours of the night.  With no hope of a stay from the governor, Reese patrols his cell with the psychopathic vigor so commonly incident to countless films about serial killers (an egregious cliché of which, I fear, the film industry will never quite rid itself).  Reese talks his crazy talk, Hobbes remains perfectly cool and we see nothing bizarre in this exchange until Reese speaks in a guttural tongue that Hobbes reasonably assumes to be Hebrew.  But Reese corrects him: he is speaking Dutch.  If that were not sufficiently unusual, Reese then switches into another language which few could ever identify and breaks into this popular tune that will serve as a beacon throughout the film.  Reese ultimately succumbs to the fumes of the hideous chamber, Hobbes looks on in disgust – perhaps at both the method and subject of the execution – and the first scene of our film comes to the end we know it cannot maintain.  Indeed, the anonymous calls persist; more disturbing, however, is the fact that the killings continue to be carried out in Reese's peculiar style.  Hobbes smartly intuits that since the calls had not been reported to the press, the informant must be an insider and the copycat killer must simply have purchased or blackmailed the right officer.  Sniffing around for the culprit brings Hobbes to a missing plaque for an officer of the year award, an oddity clarified by a story about another policeman who died about thirty years ago after a dishonorable discharge.  His daughter Gretta Milano (Embeth Davidtz) is now a theologian living alone and no longer in search of answers regarding her father's death, which she categorically refuses to discuss with a curious Hobbes.  So when Gretta asks him what his religious views are, to which he replies that he is neither an agnostic nor a churchgoer, her subsequent reaction does not betray whether such information will help or hurt his case.

What I have casually omitted are a host of other details that suggest something rather despicable afoot, although it is perhaps more amusing to consider some of the reviews of Fallen.  Despite a gaggle of supporters, the predominant opinion on the answers provided by the story's gradual unfurling is one of incredulous frustration.  How could Hobbes, a man devoted to forensic science, begin to believe that something outside of man's knowledge of the world might be committing these crimes?  How could anyone in his right and rational mind possibly be entertained by a slow-paced, non-action-oriented film whose main character never appears on screen?  What could possess a number of cast members to take turns singing the same song, suddenly become left-handed, and cackle sadistically at some unsaid joke?  Given the paucity of evidence in Hobbes's hands, there are only a few conclusions to be drawn, one of which involves his own mental equilibrium.  The original Hobbes was a pessimist who had nothing nice to say about humanity's destiny; our Hobbes is not built the same way.  He believes, for better or worse, that people are inherently good.  Now that's a novel concept.

Sunday
Jan042009

Mallarmé, "Les fenêtres"

A work ("The windows") by this renowned French symbolist.  You can read the original here.

Fatigued by hospice bed and incense foul  
Aloft in plainest white against the drape,    
To empty wall's pale Cross of bulging shape,
The sly and dying man addressed his scowl.

He lurched, yet not to warm his coil's decay, 
But to behold the sun upon the stones, 
To press his body's thin white hairs and bones  
To sunbed windows of fierce browning ray.

Azure blue, hungry, hot, his mouth still young 
A treasure of past days anew breathed in,
And spoiled warm squares of gold, sweet virgin skin,
With long and bitter kisses now far-flung.

And drunk, forgetting fears of holy oils,
He finds the clock, his bed, the tisanes while
He coughs; and when the evening bleeds on tiles
His eye, gorged on horizon's brightness, toils.

He sees fine golden galleys there asleep,
A purple river's swans in perfume's haze,
The rich and tawny flash of their lines sways 
In unimportant waves of sights he'll keep.

Thus seized by horror for an austere soul,
Now wallowing in joy and met desires, 
I stubbornly pick through the refuse mires
To aid the woman suckling her young foal.

I flee and hang upon these windows bare    
From which I turn my back to life and news, 
In their glass blessed, washed with eternal dews
Which gild the chaste and endless morning glare.

Angelic in mirrors, I love and die
And may these panes be mystic or be art
To be reborn, a crown of dreams apart 
Where beauty blooms in tender bygone sky!

Alas, the earth is master here; its dread 
Will sicken me, safe from my nemesis, 
And foolish musings' impure emesis
Obliges me to hold my breath instead.

And I, whom bitterness knows well, should I
Then break the crystal, break the monster's toy
Escape on unplumed wings in search of joy,
And risk eternal fall in darkest sky?